Automatic Protein
Crystallization in an Anaerobic Environment
|
|
|
Bret Dillard |
|
|
|
B.C. Wang Lab |
|
University of Georgia |
|
|
|
07/21/06 |
Basis for Anaerobic
Crystallization
|
|
|
|
Many proteins exist in an
anaerobic environment |
|
Lose cofactors such as
iron-sulfur clusters in oxygen environment |
|
Need to reproduce redox state
of cofactors such as FAD+ and NAD+ |
|
Many crystallographers need to
see different redox states of protein conformations for biological studies |
Many Ways to Solve This
Problem
|
|
|
|
Anaerobic experiments (in a
chamber) |
|
Sitting drop experiments |
|
Hanging drop experiments |
|
Capillary diffusion experiments |
|
Or use Douglas robot in Bactron
X chamber |
|
|
Differences Between
Techniques
|
|
|
|
Amount of Protein |
|
Hanging drop, sitting drop, and
capillary techniques use copious amounts of protein and crystallizing agent |
|
Microbatch diffusion uses 300nl
of protein per condition (in this experiment) |
|
Microbatch allows use of same
mother liquor for many experiments |
|
|
The Chamber
|
|
|
Using Sheldon Manufacturing
Bactron X chamber with custom wall joint one can run robot with computer
outside the chamber |
Connections and Oxygen
Detection
|
|
|
24 parallel ports allow
computer to run robot from outside the chamber |
|
Using 5% hydrogen / 95%
nitrogen gas mix we are allowed to detect oxygen levels inside the chamber |
|
The same gas mix also allows us
to use palladium catalyst to remove oxygen at an accelerated rate |
The Overall Setup
Crystallization of Oxygen
Sensitive Protein
|
|
|
|
We have purified and
crystallized four proteins that are not stable in an oxygen environment |
|
The structure of one of these
proteins (rubrerythrin) has been solved using anaerobic techniques as of this
moment. |
|
This protein was previously
solved with zinc being coordinated in an aerobic environment |
|
The native protein contains
iron but is unstable in oxygen |
|
We now have the native iron
form of this oxygen labile protein through using this system |
Iron Form of Rubrerythrin
Advantages of Method
|
|
|
|
Use of less protein |
|
Sitting drop, hanging drop, and
capillary methods use large volumes of protein |
|
Microbatch uses only 300nl of
protein per condition |
|
Less time involved in
experiment |
|
Sitting drop, hanging drop, and
capillary methods require intensive attention per experiment |
|
Microbatch requires only
initial setup and the robot performs the experiment |